Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the decision of the Department. He found that certain information in the record is exempt from release under section 33(1)(d) of the FOI Act. However, he found that the remaining information in the record is not exempt from release under any of the exemptions relied upon by the Department
Date: 05-11-2025
Case Number: OIC-150501-J2F0P7
Public Body: The Department of Foreign Affairs
Section of the Act.:
Summary: None
Date: 04-10-2025
Case Number: OIC-157178-L0R1N6
Public Body: Trinity College Dublin
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a), s.17, s.17(4),
Summary: The Investigator varied An Coimisiún’s decision.
Date: 03-11-2025
Case Number: OIC-149635-B4K1S6
Public Body: Coimisiún na Meán
Section of the Act.: s.30, s.30(1)(c), s.36, s.36(1)(b),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the HSE’s decision.
Date: 31-10-2025
Case Number: OIC-157386-K1X8Z4
Public Body: Health Service Executive
Section of the Act.: s.37, s.37(1),
Summary: The Investigator affirmed Revenue’s decision.
Date: 30-10-2025
Case Number: OIC-159101-G5X7G8
Public Body: Office of the Revenue Commissioners
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied Tusla’s decision. He found that it was justified in redacting certain information from the records released on the basis of section 37(1) of the FOI Act. He found that Tusla was not justified in its effective refusal, under section 15(1)(a), to grant access to any further relevant records. He annulled that part of the decision and remitted the matter back to Tusla for fresh consideration.
Date: 30-10-2025
Case Number: OIC-154801-X1V1X5
Public Body: Tulsa
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the Department’s decision. He found that it was justified in refusing access, under section 36(1)(b), to certain information in the records but that it was not justified in refusing access to the remainder of the records under sections 35(1)(a) or 36(1)(b) and he directed their release.
Date: 30-10-2025
Case Number: OIC-151107-V7Y5Q8
Public Body: Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine
Section of the Act.: s.35, s.35(1)(a), s.36, s.36(1)(b),
Summary: The Investigator affirmed the HSE’s decision
Date: 29-10-2025
Case Number: OIC-153551-P0G1M7
Public Body: Health Service Executive
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(g), s.15(1)(i)(i), s.31,
Summary: The Investigator affirmed the HSE’s decision
Date: 28-10-2025
Case Number: OIC-161674-C3S1R5
Public Body: Health Service Executive (HSE)
Section of the Act.: s.37, s.37(1),
Summary: The Investigator affirmed the Council’s decision to refuse access to the complaint under section 42(m) of the Act
Date: 28-10-2025
Case Number: OIC-160507-Q4H3K6
Public Body: Louth County Council
Section of the Act.: s.42, s.42(m), s.42(m)(i), s.35