Summary: The Investigator affirmed Revenue’s decision.
Date: 30-10-2025
Case Number: OIC-159101-G5X7G8
Public Body: Office of the Revenue Commissioners
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied Tusla’s decision. He found that it was justified in redacting certain information from the records released on the basis of section 37(1) of the FOI Act. He found that Tusla was not justified in its effective refusal, under section 15(1)(a), to grant access to any further relevant records. He annulled that part of the decision and remitted the matter back to Tusla for fresh consideration.
Date: 30-10-2025
Case Number: OIC-154801-X1V1X5
Public Body: Tulsa
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the Department’s decision. He found that it was justified in refusing access, under section 36(1)(b), to certain information in the records but that it was not justified in refusing access to the remainder of the records under sections 35(1)(a) or 36(1)(b) and he directed their release.
Date: 30-10-2025
Case Number: OIC-151107-V7Y5Q8
Public Body: Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine
Section of the Act.: s.35, s.35(1)(a), s.36, s.36(1)(b),
Summary: The Investigator affirmed the HSE’s decision
Date: 29-10-2025
Case Number: OIC-153551-P0G1M7
Public Body: Health Service Executive
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(g), s.15(1)(i)(i), s.31,
Summary: The Investigator affirmed the HSE’s decision
Date: 28-10-2025
Case Number: OIC-161674-C3S1R5
Public Body: Health Service Executive (HSE)
Section of the Act.: s.37, s.37(1),
Summary: The Investigator affirmed the Council’s decision to refuse access to the complaint under section 42(m) of the Act
Date: 28-10-2025
Case Number: OIC-160507-Q4H3K6
Public Body: Louth County Council
Section of the Act.: s.42, s.42(m), s.42(m)(i), s.35
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed Revenue’s decision.
Date: 28-10-2025
Case Number: OIC-153115-N3X7L7
Public Body: Office of the Revenue Commissioners
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),
Summary: The Investigator affirmed the Hospital’s decision.
Date: 24-10-2025
Case Number: OIC-158223-Q3P9Q9
Public Body: St. James's Hospital
Section of the Act.: s.37, s.37(3), s.37(4),
Summary: The Investigator annulled the Department’s decision.
Date: 24-10-2025
Case Number: OIC-160995-K2L0Q5
Public Body: Department of Justice
Section of the Act.: s.14
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the Department’s decision. He found that section 28(1)(a) (record submitted to Government) applied to some records and that section 28(3)(a) (release of factual information) did not apply. He found that the remaining records were not exempt and directed their release.
Date: 23-10-2025
Case Number: OIC-146244-K8D2V5
Public Body: Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage
Section of the Act.: s.28, s.28(1)(a), s.28(3)(a), s.29, s.29(1),