OIC Decisions
Decisions issued from January 2022 onwards can be found here. Earlier decisions will be uploaded in the coming months. If you require an earlier decision then please email us at info@oic.ie
Decisions issued from January 2022 onwards can be found here. Earlier decisions will be uploaded in the coming months. If you require an earlier decision then please email us at info@oic.ie
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of QQI. He found that QQI was not required, under section 10, to provide the statements of reasons sought.
Date: 10-12-2018
Case Number: 180205
Public Body: Quality and Qualifications Ireland
Section of the Act.: s.10
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the HSE to refuse access to the information sought under section 42(m)(i) of the FOI Act.
Date: 10-12-2018
Case Number: 180235
Public Body: Health Service Executive
Section of the Act.: s.42, s.42(m)(i),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Institute to refuse access to the information sought under section 37(1)
Date: 10-12-2018
Case Number: 180334
Public Body: Cork Institute of Technology
Section of the Act.: s.37, s.37(1),
Summary: The Senior Investigator annulled the decision of TUSLA and directed it to undertake a fresh decision-making process in respect of the request
Date: 06-12-2018
Case Number: 180335
Public Body: TUSLA
Section of the Act.: s.37
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the decision of the HSE. He found that the HSE was not justified in redacting certain information relating solely to the applicant's minor son or to certain information relating solely to the applicant and her minor son under section 37(1). He found that it was justified in redacting the remaining information at issue under section 37(1)
Date: 06-12-2018
Case Number: 180336
Public Body: Health Service Executive
Section of the Act.: s.37, s.37(1),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Defence Forces that it is not required, by virtue of section 10(2)(a), to provide a more detailed statement of reasons as to why the applicant was unsuccessful in his application for recruitment to the Defence Forces.
Date: 05-12-2018
Case Number: 180364
Public Body: Defence Forces
Section of the Act.: s.33, s.33(3)(a), s.10
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied TUSLA's decision. She affirmed TUSLA's decision in relation to some records and directed the release of certain parts which she found not to be exempt under section 37. She remitted aspects of the case to TUSLA for a fresh decision making process to be undertaken on records not previously considered.
Date: 05-12-2018
Case Number: 180312
Public Body: TUSLA: Child and Family Agency
Section of the Act.: s.37
Summary: 180331
Date: 04-12-2018
Case Number: 180331
Public Body: Cork City Council
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the HSE.
Date: 03-12-2018
Case Number: 170526
Public Body: Health Service Executive
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the HSE.
Date: 03-12-2018
Case Number: 180250
Public Body: Health Service Executive
Section of the Act.: s.37