OIC Decisions
Decisions issued from January 2022 onwards can be found here. Earlier decisions will be uploaded in the coming months. If you require an earlier decision then please email us at info@oic.ie
Decisions issued from January 2022 onwards can be found here. Earlier decisions will be uploaded in the coming months. If you require an earlier decision then please email us at info@oic.ie
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the Institute was not justified in refusing access to parts of the records at issue. She varied the Institute's decision, directing the release of records, in part. She found that the Institute was justified in its refusal to release further records, on the basis that such records either do not exist or cannot be found after reasonable searches had been carried out.
Date: 04-06-2015
Case Number: 150016
Public Body: Cork Institute of Technology
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the Institute was not justified in refusing access to parts of the records at issue. She varied the Institute's decision, directing the release of records, in part. She found that the Institute was justified in its refusal to release further records, on the basis that such records either do not exist or cannot be found after reasonable searches had been carried out.
Date: 04-06-2015
Case Number: 150076
Public Body: Cork Institute of Technology
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the section 38 requirements were not applied correctly in this case and annulled the decision of the Department.
Date: 03-06-2015
Case Number: 150122
Public Body: Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport
Section of the Act.: s.38
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Council.
Date: 29-05-2015
Case Number: 150045
Public Body: Galway County Council
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the HSE was justified in deciding to refuse access to records relating to the applicant, on the ground that the records are exempt under section 28 of the FOI Act. She affirmed the decision of the HSE.
Date: 29-05-2015
Case Number: 150065
Public Body: HSE West
Section of the Act.: s.26, s.28
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that TUSLA was justified in deciding to partially refuse access to the records in accordance with section 42(m)(i) of the FOI Act. She affirmed the decision of TUSLA.
Date: 29-05-2015
Case Number: 150061
Public Body: The Child and Family Agency (TUSLA)
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the Council was justified its decision to refuse access to the records sought by the applicant under section 10(1)(a) of the FOI Act. He affirmed the decision of the Council.
Date: 26-05-2015
Case Number: 150022
Public Body: Galway City Council
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the HSE's decision.
Date: 26-05-2015
Case Number: 150054
Public Body: Health Service Executive
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the Department was justified in its decision to refuse access to further relevant records under sections 10(1)(a) and 28(1) of the FOI Act. He affirmed the decision of the Department.
Date: 25-05-2015
Case Number: 140341
Public Body: Department of Social Protection
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the HSE's decision.
Date: 25-05-2015
Case Number: 140355
Public Body: Health Service Executive
Section of the Act.: