OIC Decisions
Decisions issued from January 2022 onwards can be found here. Earlier decisions will be uploaded in the coming months. If you require an earlier decision then please email us at info@oic.ie
Decisions issued from January 2022 onwards can be found here. Earlier decisions will be uploaded in the coming months. If you require an earlier decision then please email us at info@oic.ie
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the HSE was justified in refusing access to the information sought under section 28(1) of the FOI Act. He affirmed the decision of the HSE.
Date: 11-05-2015
Case Number: 150026
Public Body: Health Service Executive
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the section 38 requirements were not applied correctly in this case and annulled the decision of the Department.
Date: 11-05-2015
Case Number: 150106
Public Body: Department of Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht
Section of the Act.: s.38, s.38(2),
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the Council was justified in its decision to refuse access to records under sections 10(1)(a), 22(1)(a), 23(1)(b) and 28(1) of the FOI Act.
Date: 08-05-2015
Case Number: 140184
Public Body: Tipperary County Council
Section of the Act.:
Summary: Whether TUSLA was justified in deciding to refuse access to parts of the applicant's file on the grounds that the records are exempt from release under section 28 of the FOI Act
Date: 08-05-2015
Case Number: 140188
Public Body: TUSLA
Section of the Act.: s.28
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the HSE. He found that the HSE fulfilled the requirements of section 18 of the FOI Act in this case.
Date: 05-05-2015
Case Number: 140331
Public Body: HSE Dublin North East
Section of the Act.: s.18
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the Department was not justified in its decision to refuse access to the records in question under section 20(1) of the FOI Act. He annulled the decision of the Department and directed the release of the records in full.
Date: 27-04-2015
Case Number: 140344
Public Body: Department of Justice and Equality
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the Council was not justified in refusing access to one record under sections 23 and 26 of the FOI Act, but also found that the Council was justified under section 28 of the FOI Act in refusing access to elements of the records at issue containing the personal information of third parties. He varied the Council's decision.
Date: 23-04-2015
Case Number: 140209
Public Body: Dun Laoghaire - Rathdown County Council
Section of the Act.: s.28,
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the HSE was justified in its decision to refuse access to the records sought in accordance with the provisions of section 10(1)(a) of the FOI Act. He affirmed the decision of the HSE.
Date: 23-04-2015
Case Number: 140309
Public Body: HSE Mid - Leinster
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the HSE was justified in its decision to refuse access to the records sought in accordance with the provisions of section 10(1)(a) of the FOI Act. He affirmed the decision of the HSE.
Date: 23-04-2015
Case Number: 140310
Public Body: HSE
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the Services was justified in refusing access to the records in accordance with section 15(1)(a) of the FOI Act. He affirmed the decision of the Services.
Date: 23-04-2015
Case Number: 150004
Public Body: Brothers of Charity Services
Section of the Act.: