Cinntí OIC
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of UCD to refuse access to the withheld records on the basis of section 15(1)(a) of the FOI Act. She also found that further records which may exist are held by a separate entity and are not held or under the control of UCD as required by section 2(5) of the FOI Act
Date: 21-09-2016
Case Number: 160071
Public Body: University College Dublin
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the decision of Revenue. She affirmed Revenue's decision to refuse access to a record of internal communications involving the Revenue Solicitors Office (RSO) and the Revenue Legislation Services (RLO) under section 31(1)(a) of the FOI Act. She found that section 31(1)(a) also applied to a Report to the Appeals Committee. She annulled Revenue's decision in relation to the remaining records at issue and directed their release subject to the redaction of a private mobile telephone number from one of the records concerned.
Date: 20-09-2016
Case Number: 160002
Public Body: Office of the Revenue Commissioners
Section of the Act.: s.31, s.31(1)(a), s.31(1)(c),
Summary: The Senior Investigator upheld the decision of the Department.
Date: 19-09-2016
Case Number: 160064
Public Body: Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport
Section of the Act.: s.36, s.37
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the hospital was justified in its decision to refuse access to the records sought by the applicant under section 15(1)(a) of the FOI Act. She affirmed the decision of the hospital.
Date: 19-09-2016
Case Number: 160244
Public Body: St Vincent's University Hospital
Section of the Act.: s.15
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the HSE to withhold certain information contained in the report on the ground that the information is personal information for the purposes of section 37 of the FOI Act
Date: 16-09-2016
Case Number: 160223
Public Body: Health Service Executive West
Section of the Act.: s.37, s.37(1), s.37(2), s.37(5), s.37(7),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Defence Forces.
Date: 25-09-2016
Case Number: 160271
Public Body: Defence Forces
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the Department's decision.
Date: 15-09-2016
Case Number: 160322
Public Body: Department of Finance
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Council to refuse access to the records sought under section 36(1)(c) of the FOI Act.
Date: 12-09-2016
Case Number: 160247
Public Body: Mayo County Council
Section of the Act.: s.36
Summary: The Senior Investigator annulled the decision of the Council in this case and directed the Council to undertake a fresh decision-making process in respect of the original request.
Date: 08-09-2016
Case Number: 160279
Public Body: Kerry County Council
Section of the Act.: s.36
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the Council was not justified in its decision to refuse the request under section 15(1)(a) of the Act. He annulled the decision of the Council and directed it to undertake a fresh decision making process on the request.
Date: 07-09-2016
Case Number: 160211
Public Body: Dublin City Council
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),