Cinntí OIC
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Council.
Date: 17-06-2022
Case Number: OIC-118757-X9D7P0
Public Body: Meath County Council
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),
Summary: The Senior Investigator annulled the Department's decision on the ground that it did not comply with the provisions of section 15(4) of the FOI Act before refusing the request under section 15(1)(c) and on the ground that it was not entitled to refuse access to the records under section 37 of the Act in circumstances where it had failed to process the request and examine the records. She directed the Department to consider the request afresh.
Date: 17-06-2022
Case Number: OIC-114078-D1D6L7
Public Body: Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(c),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Defence Forces
Date: 13-06-2022
Case Number: OIC-118530-F6B6L5
Public Body: Defence Forces
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the Council's decision
Date: 13-06-2022
Case Number: OIC-114063-S3G3Q0
Public Body: Cork County Council
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Courts Service.
Date: 10-06-2022
Case Number: OIC-120008-Q9F2P2
Public Body: The Courts Service
Section of the Act.: s.41,
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the decision of Tusla. He affirmed Tusla's decision to refuse access to the majority of the information in the record concerned under section 37 of the Act. He annulled its decision to refuse to release the remaining information contained in the record which relates to the applicant's son and remitted the matter back to the Tusla for consideration afresh in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act 2014 (Section 37(8)) Regulations 2016.
Date: 10-06-2022
Case Number: OIC-120030-Z7M0G6
Public Body: Tusla
Section of the Act.: s.37, s.37(1), s.37(7),
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the decision of the LSRA. He directed the release of the name and address of the legal practice on the ground that it was not personal information within the meaning of the FOI Act.
Date: 07-06-2022
Case Number: OIC-119156-K0R6D8
Public Body: Legal Services Regulatory Authority
Section of the Act.: s.37, s.37(1),
Summary: The Senior Investigator annulled Tusla's decision and remitted the request to be processed afresh.
Date: 07-06-2022
Case Number: OIC-117905-Y1P1B1
Public Body: Tusla
Section of the Act.: s.37, s.37(1), s.37(8),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of Tusla.
Date: 30-05-2022
Case Number: OIC-118383-G2R2L0
Public Body: Tusla
Section of the Act.: s.37, s.37(1),
Summary: The Senior Investigator annulled the Council's decision to grant access to the records and directed the Council to conduct a fresh decision making process on the FOI request in accordance with the provisions of the FOI Act
Date: 30-05-2022
Case Number: OIC-111484-Q0B4D8
Public Body: Fingal County Council
Section of the Act.: s.35, s.36, s.37