Cinntí OIC
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Summary: The Investigator affirmed TCD's decision.
Date: 07-04-2022
Case Number: OIC-117203-J4M0N5
Public Body: Trinity College Dublin
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the DPC.
Date: 05-04-2022
Case Number: OIC-118029-N1X3P8
Public Body: Data Protection Commission
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the Department's decision.
Date: 04-04-2022
Case Number: OIC-117316-X1R6G6
Public Body: Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine
Section of the Act.: s.9
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Defence Forces.
Date: 04-04-2022
Case Number: OIC-119543-T1S5R7
Public Body: Defence Forces
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a), s.10
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the decision of the Council
Date: 01-04-2022
Case Number: OIC-109746-R5F4M4
Public Body: Cork County Council
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied TCD's decision. She found that TCD was justified in refusing access to certain records under section 31(1)(a) of the FOI Act on the basis of legal professional privilege. She found, however, that TCD was not justified in refusing access to the remaining records under sections 36(1)(b) or (c) of the FOI Act on the basis that they contain commercially sensitive information.
Date: 25-03-2022
Case Number: OIC-104341-G0S9X9
Public Body: Trinity College Dublin
Section of the Act.: s.31, s.31(1)(a), s.36, s.36(1)(b), s.36(1)(c),
Summary: The Senior Investigator annulled the Institute's decision. She found that it was not justified in refusing access to the information at issue under section 35(1)(a) of the FOI Act and she directed the release of this information to the applicant.
Date: 24-03-2022
Case Number: OIC-110146-L5P8C2
Public Body: Waterford Institute of Technology
Section of the Act.: s.35, s.35(1),
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the Department's decision. She annulled its effective position that it had taken all reasonable steps to ascertain the whereabouts of records covered by the request (section 15(1)(a)) and directed the Department to make a new decision on this matter in accordance with the provisions of the FOI Act. She affirmed its application of sections 15(1)(i) (records available to the applicant), 31(1)(a) (legal professional privilege) and 42(f) (Attorney General records) to some of the records. She found that section 37(1) (personal information) applied to the rest and that the public interest did not weigh in favour of their release.
Date: 23-03-2022
Case Number: OIC-100805-Z6M3F8
Public Body: Department of Defence
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a), s.15(1)(i), s.31, s.31(1)(a), s.37, s.37(1), s.37(6), s.42, s.42(f),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the Department's decision. She found that section 37(1) of the FOI Act (personal information) applied to the records and that the public interest did not weigh in favour of their release.
Date: 23-03-2022
Case Number: OIC-100775-Z7M7M6
Public Body: Department of Defence
Section of the Act.: s.37, s.37(1), s.37(6),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Council to refuse the request. While he found that it was not justified in refusing access to the records under section 32(1)(a), he found them to be exempt from release under section 37(1).
Date: 22-03-2022
Case Number: OIC-105864-R3S0Q8
Public Body: Cork City Council
Section of the Act.: s.32, s.32(1)(a), s.37, s.37(1),