Cinntí OIC
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the Department's decision. She found that it had not justified its refusal of access under section 29 (deliberative process). She did not accept Airbnb's arguments that the section 35 exemption (confidential information) applies to the records. She affirmed the Department's refusal of access to two records and parts of a third under section 36(1)(b) on the basis that she was satisfied that access could prejudice Airbnb's competitive position in the conduct of its business. She also found that, on balance, the public interest did not weigh in favour of the grant of access to these records. She annulled the Department's refusal of access to the rest of the records and directed that access be granted to them..
Date: 30-10-2018
Case Number: 180209
Public Body: Department of Housing, Planning and Local Government
Section of the Act.: s.35,
Summary: The Senior Investigator annulled the decision of the HSE and directed it to undertake a fresh decision-making process on the requests.
Date: 25-10-2018
Case Number: 180225 AND 180240
Public Body: Health Service Executive
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(i),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the HSE to refuse the request under section 37(3).
Date: 23-10-2018
Case Number: 180326
Public Body: Health Service Executive
Section of the Act.: s.37, s.37(3),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the HSE. He found that it was justified in refusing access to further records falling within the scope of the applicant's request on the basis that it had conducted reasonable searches and that section 15(1)(a) of the FOI Act applied.
Date: 22-10-2018
Case Number: 170554
Public Body: HSE Dublin Mid-Leinster
Section of the Act.: s.15
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the PRA's decision, under section 41 of the FOI Act.
Date: 21-10-2018
Case Number: 180251
Public Body: Property Registration Authority
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the Body's refusal of the applicant's requests under section 15(1)(g) on the ground that they are vexatious.
Date: 18-10-2018
Case Number: 180236
Public Body: An FOI Body
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(g),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the Body's refusal of the applicant's requests under section 15(1)(g) on the ground that they are vexatious.
Date: 18-10-2018
Case Number: 180237
Public Body: An FOI Body
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(g),
Summary: The Senior Investigator annulled the decision of the Council. She found that it was not justified in refusing access to the transcript under section 42(a) of the Act and she directed its release.
Date: 18-10-2018
Case Number: 180284
Public Body: Roscommon County Council
Section of the Act.: s.42
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that PAS was justified in redacting information from one record under section 30(1)(a) and in refusing access to any additional relevant records under section 15(1)(a) on the ground that no further relevant records exist.
Date: 16-10-2018
Case Number: 180233
Public Body: Public Appointments Service
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.30, s.32, s.37
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Institute.
Date: 16-10-2018
Case Number: 180311
Public Body: Institute of Technology Carlow
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),