Cinntí OIC
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Summary: The Senior Investigator annulled the decision of the Council. She found that it had not satisfied this Office that its refusal was justified. She directed the Council to undertake a fresh decision making process on the applicant's request.
Date: 19-07-2017
Case Number: 170090
Public Body: Dun Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council
Section of the Act.: s.2, s.2(5), s.15, s.15(1)(a),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Defence Forces. She found that the Defence Forces had justified its decision to refuse to grant the application under section 9 of the FOI Act.
Date: 18-07-2017
Case Number: 170140
Public Body: Defence Forces
Section of the Act.: s.9
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the OPW was justified in its decision to refuse access to the records on the basis that sections 15(1)(a) and 37 of the FOI Act applied. She affirmed the OPW's decision to refuse access to additional records under section 15(1)(a) of the FOI Act. She also affirmed its decision to refuse access to records on the basis that section 37(1) of the FOI Act applied, since the withheld information contains the personal information of individuals other than the applicant. She found that the public interest in granting the request did not outweigh the public interest in upholding the privacy rights of those individuals.
Date: 18-07-2017
Case Number: 170163
Public Body: Office of Public Works
Section of the Act.: s.37, s.37(1), s.15
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the Body's decision. She annulled its effective refusal of access to certain records that came to light during the review, and remitted this matter to the Body for fresh consideration and decision. She affirmed the Body's effective reliance on section 15(1)(a) in refusing to grant access to any further records relevant to this particular request.
Date: 13-07-2017
Case Number: 170091
Public Body: An FOI Body
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Department. She found that the Department had justified withholding the records under section 30(1)(c).
Date: 13-07-2017
Case Number: 170125
Public Body: Department of Education and Skills
Section of the Act.: s.30, s.30(1),
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the section 38 requirements were not applied correctly in this case and annulled the decision of the University. She directed it to conduct a new decision making process in compliance with the FOI Act.
Date: 11-07-2017
Case Number: 170332
Public Body: Louth County Council
Section of the Act.: s.38
Summary: The Senior Investigator annulled the Council's decision to refuse access to the records and directed their release to the applicant.
Date: 10-07-2017
Case Number: 170071
Public Body: Wicklow County Council
Section of the Act.: s.31, s.31(1)(a), s.30
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the HSE.
Date: 10-07-2017
Case Number: 170149
Public Body: HSE West
Section of the Act.: s.28, s.28(5)(a), s.28(5)(b), s.28(5),
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the decision of the Department. While he found that it was justified in refusing access to various drafts of the Scheme of the Judicial Council Bill, he found that it was not justified in granting only partial access to correspondence between the Minister and the judiciary on the matter.
Date: 10-07-2017
Case Number: 160576
Public Body: Department of Justice and Equality
Section of the Act.: s.28, s.29, s.30, s.35
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Council.
Date: 07-07-2017
Case Number: 170153
Public Body: Dublin City Council
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),