Cinntí OIC
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of AGS.
Date: 28-06-2016
Case Number: 160054
Public Body: An Garda Síochána
Section of the Act.: s.42
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of AGS.
Date: 28-06-2016
Case Number: 160184
Public Body: An Garda Síochána
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision to refuse access to the records on the basis of section 37(1) and section 37(7) of the FOI Act. She found that to grant access to the withheld parts of records would involve the disclosure of personal information of individuals other than the applicant and that the public interest that the request should be granted does not outweigh the public interest that the right of privacy of those individuals should be upheld.
Date: 28-06-2016
Case Number: 160120
Public Body: The Health Service Executive
Section of the Act.: s.37, s.37(1), s.37(7),
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the Hospital was justified in its decision to refuse access to the records sought by the applicant. He affirmed the decision of the Hospital.
Date: 28-06-2016
Case Number: 160095
Public Body: St James's Hospital
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the Department's decision.
Date: 23-06-2016
Case Number: 150380
Public Body: Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine
Section of the Act.: s.37
Summary: The Senior Investigator upheld the HSE's decision. She found sections 37(1) and 37(7) of the FOI Act to apply to the withheld details. She found these details to comprise either third party personal information, or third party personal information that is inextricably linked to the personal information of the applicant (joint personal information). She found that the public interest that the rights of privacy of the third parties to whom the information relates (that is to say, those parties other than the applicant) should be upheld outweighs the public interest that the request be granted.
Date: 23-06-2016
Case Number: 150408
Public Body: The Health Service Executive
Section of the Act.: s.37
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of UCD.
Date: 22-06-2016
Case Number: 160037
Public Body: University College Dublin
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(c),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Department to refuse access to report. She found that the FOI Act does not apply to the record on the basis of section 42(f).
Date: 21-06-2016
Case Number: 160094
Public Body: Department of Justice and Equality
Section of the Act.: s.42
Summary: The Senior Investigator annulled the HSE's decision to withhold the records and directed their release.
Date: 21-06-2016
Case Number: 160093
Public Body: Health Service Executive
Section of the Act.: s.30, s.30(1)(a), s.30(1)(b),
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the decision of the HSE. He directed the release of the identity of the agency that made a referral to the HSE as contained in one of the records.
Date: 21-06-2016
Case Number: 150443
Public Body: Health Service Executive
Section of the Act.: s.37