Cinntí OIC
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the decision of the Council and directed the release of one further record, subject to the redaction of personal information. He affirmed the Council's decision on the remainder of the records
Date: 24-07-2015
Case Number: 150090
Public Body: Dun Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council
Section of the Act.: s.22, s.28
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the Hospital's decision.
Date: 23-07-2015
Case Number: 150059
Public Body: Beaumont Hospital
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator annulled the decision of the HSE to charge a search and retrieval fee in this case
Date: 23-07-2015
Case Number: 150029
Public Body: HSE West
Section of the Act.: s.47
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the section 38 requirements were not applied correctly in this case to such an extent that the Commissioner had no jurisdiction to deal further with it. She annulled the decision of the Department.
Date: 22-07-2015
Case Number: 150156
Public Body: Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources
Section of the Act.: s.22, s.22(2),
Summary: The Senior Investigator, following notification by the HSE of a change in its position, annulled the decision to refuse access to records on the basis of section 28(3) and directed that a fresh decision making process be undertaken.
Date: 21-07-2015
Case Number: 150130
Public Body: HSE West
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the decision of the Council by affirming the decision to refuse access in relation to some of the records on the ground that the records are exempt under section 27 of the FOI Act and by directing the release of certain other records.
Date: 15-07-2015
Case Number: 140225
Public Body: Dublin City Council
Section of the Act.: s.27, s.27(1),
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the Council was justified in its decision to refuse access to the records under sections 30(1)(a) and 31(1)(a) of the FOI Act. She affirmed the decision of the Council.
Date: 15-07-2015
Case Number: 150081
Public Body: Clare County Council
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the Department was justified in its decision to refuse access to the record sought by the applicant under section 15(1)(a) of the FOI Act. She affirmed the decision of the Department
Date: 15-07-2015
Case Number: 150075
Public Body: The Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed Revenue's refusal of access to the information in the records under section 21(1)(a) of the FOI Act.
Date: 15-07-2015
Case Number: 150036
Public Body: The Office of the Revenue Commissioners
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Council by finding that the refusal of access to records by the Council is justified under section 15(1)(a) and section 15(1)(i)(i) of the FOI Act.
Date: 13-07-2015
Case Number: 150043
Public Body: Mayo County Council
Section of the Act.: