Cinntí OIC
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the Revenue's decision.
Date: 13-08-2014
Case Number: 130002
Public Body: The Revenue Commissioners
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the Council's decision
Date: 11-08-2014
Case Number: 120320
Public Body: Cork County Council
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed Teagasc's decision as described above.
Date: 09-07-2014
Case Number: 130316
Public Body: Teagasc
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the Department was justified in its refusal of a statement of reasons on the grounds that the applicant had not demonstrated a material interest as required under the provisions of section 18 of the FOI Act. The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Department.
Date: 03-07-2014
Case Number: 140020
Public Body: Department of Education and Skills
Section of the Act.: s.18, s.18(6),
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the HSE was justified in its decision to refuse to amend records under section 17 of the FOI Act. He upheld the decision.
Date: 30-06-2014
Case Number: 130177
Public Body: Health Service Executive West
Section of the Act.: s.17
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the Revenue's decision to refuse access to the records at issue.
Date: 26-06-2014
Case Number: 130219
Public Body: Office of the Revenue Commissioners
Section of the Act.: s.10, s.10(1)(c), s.10(2),
Summary: The Commissioner annulled the decision of the Department and directed the release of the report concerned subject to the redaction of certain details that the applicant had agreed to exclude from the scope of the review.
Date: 26-06-2014
Case Number: 120291
Public Body: Department of Justice and Equality
Section of the Act.: s.23, s.23(1)(a)(iii), s.26, s.26(1)(a),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the Revenue's decision to refuse access to the records at issue.
Date: 26-06-2014
Case Number: 130220
Public Body: The Office of the Revenue Commissioners
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the Council was justified in its decision to refuse the applicant's request pursuant to sections 22(1)(a) and 28(1) of the FOI Act, and to make redactions to certain records that were released to the applicant, under section 28(1) of the Act. He affirmed the decision of the Council in relation to the request.
Date: 25-06-2014
Case Number: 130174
Public Body: Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council
Section of the Act.: s.22, s.22(1)(a), s.28, s.28(1),
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that UCD was justified in its decision to refuse to amend the relevant record on the basis that the information in question does not comprise the personal information of the applicant under the provisions of the FOI Act.
Date: 24-06-2014
Case Number: 130303
Public Body: University College Dublin
Section of the Act.: s.17, s.17(1),