Cinntí OIC
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the Defence Forces was justified in refusing access to the information sought under section 28(1) of the FOI Act. He affirmed the decision of the Defence Forces.
Date: 20-04-2015
Case Number: 150005
Public Body: Defence Forces
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Commissioner found that the Council's decision to refuse access to records remaining within the scope of the review, in so far as any such records may exist, after certain other records had been released was justified under section 10(1)(a) of the FOI Act. He affirmed the Council's decision accordingly.
Date: 17-04-2015
Case Number: 110234
Public Body: Dun Laoghaire - Rathdown County Council
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the Defence Forces was justified under section 18(2) of the FOI Act in refusing to issue a statement of reasons to the applicant.
Date: 17-04-2015
Case Number: 150028
Public Body: Defence Forces
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the decision of the Department. She upheld the refusal of part of one record under section 27(1)(b). She annulled the Department's refusal of access to the remaining records under sections 21(1)(c), 27(1)(b), 31(1)(a), 31(2)(k), and 31(2)(n) of the Act and directed the Department to release the records in question.
Date: 17-04-2015
Case Number: 130271
Public Body: Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the decision of the Department. She affirmed that part of its decision relating to section 10(1)(a) and directed that one record located as part of the search for records should be released. She annulled the Department's decision to refuse access to the remaining records under sections 27(1)(b), 31(1)(a), 31(1)(c), 31(2)(k), and 31(2)(n) of the Act and directed the Department to release the records in question.
Date: 17-04-2015
Case Number: 130272
Public Body: Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the decision of the Board and directed the release of additional information contained in the records at issue.
Date: 01-04-2015
Case Number: 140162
Public Body: Irish Greyhound Board
Section of the Act.: s.21, s.27, s.28, s.30, s.31
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that TUSLA was justified in its decision to refuse access to the records, in whole or in part, under section 23(1)(b) of the FOI Act
Date: 01-04-2015
Case Number: 140346
Public Body: TUSLA - Child and Family Agency
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the Council was justified in its decision to refuse access to the records sought in accordance with the provisions of section 10(1)(a) and section 22(1)(a) of the FOI Act. He affirmed the decision of the Council.
Date: 31-03-2015
Case Number: 140007
Public Body: Kildare County Council
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the Council was justified in its decision to refuse access to the records sought in accordance with the provisions of section 10(1)(a) of the FOI Act. He affirmed the decision of the Council.
Date: 31-03-2015
Case Number: 140055
Public Body: Mayo County Council
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that section 10(1)(a) of the FOI Act applied in that the HSE had carried out reasonable searches for further records relevant to parts of the request and that it had justified its position that no additional records relevant to part of the request exist. She upheld the HSE's refusal, under section 28 of the FOI Act, to refuse to release in full records covered by the review that it had found, including its refusal to release the original of a handwritten letter it had provided to the applicant in typed format. She found that the details were the joint personal information of the applicant and a number of other parties, with the public interest in protecting the rights to privacy of the other parties to whom the information also relates outweighing the public interest in release in the circumstances of this case.
Date: 30-03-2015
Case Number: 140049
Public Body: The Health Service Executive
Section of the Act.: s.10,