Cinntí OIC
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the Council was not justified in its decision to refuse the applicant's request to some records, but upheld the Council's decision in relation to the remainder. She varied the decision of the Council, directing the release in full of records 19, 55, 56, 65, 66, 68, 69, and 85, and the release in part of record 52.
Date: 19-12-2014
Case Number: 140230
Public Body: Clare County Council
Section of the Act.: s.28, s.28(1), s.20, s.22
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the decision of the CPSA to reflect his finding that the applicant had not demonstrated a material interest as required under the provisions of section 18 of the FOI Act.
Date: 19-12-2014
Case Number: 140245
Public Body: Commission for Public Service Appointments
Section of the Act.: s.18
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the Department's decision.
Date: 18-12-2014
Case Number: 140246
Public Body: Department of Social Protection
Section of the Act.: s.10, s.10(1)(a),
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the Department was justified in its decision to refuse access to the records sought in accordance with sections 2(5)(a), 10(1)(a) and 28(1) of the FOI Act. He affirmed the decision of the Department.
Date: 12-12-2014
Case Number: 140171
Public Body: Department of Public Expenditure and Reform
Section of the Act.: s.2, s.2(5)(a), s.10, s.10(1)(a), s.28, s.28(1),
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the Commission was justified in its decision to refuse access to the records sought in accordance with sections 46(2), 10(1)(a), 22(1)(c), and 39(1)(a) of the FOI Act. He affirmed the decision of the Commission.
Date: 12-12-2014
Case Number: 140178
Public Body: Houses of the Oireachtas Commission
Section of the Act.: s.10, s.10(1)(a), s.22, s.22(1)(c), s.32, s.32(1)(a), s.46, s.46(2),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Department on the grounds that it did not hold or control the records in question as required by section 2(5)(a) of the FOI Act.
Date: 12-12-2014
Case Number: 140228
Public Body: Departmet of the Taoiseach
Section of the Act.: s.2, s.2(5)(a), s.6, s.6(1), s.13, s.13(2),
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the decision of the Defence Forces and directed that one statement be amended. He upheld the decision of the Defence Forces in respect of the remaining statements.
Date: 12-12-2014
Case Number: 130257
Public Body: Defence Forces
Section of the Act.: s.17
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the Council's decision and directed that one record be released in full and one in part.
Date: 12-12-2014
Case Number: 130190
Public Body: Dun Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council
Section of the Act.: s.23, s.23(1)(a)(ii), s.23(1)(a)(iii), s.23(1)(aa), s.23(1)(b), s.26
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the decision of the IADT. She affirmed the decision to withhold certain records which qualified for legal professional privilege (section 22(1)(a)); certain records which were found to be exempt as containing commercially sensitive information (section 27(1)) and certain records which were not held (section 10(1)(a)). She directed the release of 15 records or parts of records which the IADT had identified for release together with the further remaining withheld records subject to the withholding/redaction of (1) copy of the Management Accounts and the line item pricing for the individual elements of equipment provided by the successful tenderer; (2) information provided by and correspondence with the unsuccessful tenderers and (3) identities of the unsuccessful tenderers.
Date: 12-12-2014
Case Number: 130256
Public Body: Dun Laoighre Institute of Art, Design and Technology
Section of the Act.: s.10, s.10(1)(a), s.20, s.20(1), s.22, s.22(1)(a), s.26, s.26(1)(a), s.27
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the Institute was justified in its decision to refuse access to the records sought in accordance with the provisions of sections 10(1)(a) and 28(1) of the FOI Act. He affirmed the decision of the Institute.
Date: 12-12-2014
Case Number: 130328
Public Body: Institute of Technology, Tralee
Section of the Act.: s.10, s.10(1)(a), s.28, s.28(1),