Cinntí OIC
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Department. He found that the Department had provided an adequate statement of reasons for the purposes of section 10 of the Act.
Date: 30-01-2020
Case Number: OIC-55512-Q9P1D2
Public Body: Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade
Section of the Act.: s.10
Summary: The Senior Investigator annulled the Department's decision. She found that the information was not exempt under sections 29(1) (deliberative process) or 30(1)(b) (functions relating to management). While she accepted that it was exempt under 30(1)(c) (negotiations of the Government or FOI body), she found that the public interest weighed in favour of disclosure. She directed the Department to release the figure.
Date: 30-01-2020
Case Number: OIC-56587-F9F4F3
Public Body: Department of Health
Section of the Act.: s.29, s.29(1), s.30, s.30(1)(b), s.30(1)(c),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the Department's decision. She found that section 35(1)(b) (duty of confidence) applied to the record.
Date: 30-01-2020
Case Number: OIC-56609-W8K3B3
Public Body: Department of Justice and Equality
Section of the Act.: s.35, s.35(1)(b),
Summary: The Senior Investigator annulled DCU's decision and directed it to consider the applicant?s request afresh.
Date: 29-01-2020
Case Number: OIC-57804-L4W5P8
Public Body: Dublin City University
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the Agency's decision. She upheld the Agency?s refusal of access to withheld information in records under section 37 of the FOI Act. She found that the public interest in granting the request does not outweigh the public interest in upholding the right to privacy of third parties. She found that one record did not qualify for the exemption under section 31(1)(a); she annulled that part of the decision and directed release of the record.
Date: 28-01-2020
Case Number: OIC-56254-W5B5M3
Public Body: TUSLA - Child and Family Agency
Section of the Act.: s.31, s.31(1)(a), s.37, s.37(1),
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the decision of TUSLA. While he found that TUSLA was justified in refusing access to the vast majority of the information at issue under section 37 of the FOI Act, he directed the release of 3 further pages subject to certain redactions.
Date: 27-01-2020
Case Number: OIC-55603-T9N0P1
Public Body: Ms X and TUSLA: Child and Family Agency
Section of the Act.: s.37, s.37(1),
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the IDA was not justified in its decision to extend the period for consideration of the applicant's FOI request under section 14 of the FOI Act.
Date: 27-01-2020
Case Number: OIC-58374-Z0N2X8
Public Body: Investment and Development Agency
Section of the Act.: s.14
Summary: The Commissioner annulled the decision of the Department. He found that the Department holds the records in question for the purposes of the FOI Act. He remitted the request to the Department to be processed afresh.
Date: 24-01-2020
Case Number: OIC-53487-S3Q7X3
Public Body: Department of the Taoiseach
Section of the Act.: s.11, s.11(1), s.2
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the NTMA's decision.
Date: 24-01-2020
Case Number: OIC-58612-G9F7Z0
Public Body: National Treasury Management Agency
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the decision of KWETB. He found that KWETB was justified in refusing access to certain records under sections 15(1)(a) and 37(1) apart from a small amount of information that was redacted from one record.
Date: 20-01-2020
Case Number: OIC-56818-T2L7X9
Public Body: Kildare and Wicklow Education and Training Board
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a), s.37, s.37(1),