Cinntí OIC
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Department and found that section 15(1)(c) applied to the request for access to the records.
Date: 30-06-2020
Case Number: OIC-62836-D2L7M1
Public Body: Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(c),
Summary: Dhaingnigh an tImscrúdaitheoir Sinsearach breith na Roinne agus chinn sé go raibh feidhm ag alt 15(1)(c) maidir leis an iarraidh chun rochtain a fháil ar na taifid
Date: 30-06-2020
Case Number: OIC-62836-D2L7M1
Public Body: Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(c),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the Department's decision. She found that section 29(1) applies, in that the records relate to a deliberative process and that the granting of the request would be contrary to the public interest.
Date: 30-06-2020
Case Number: OIC-68023-F9Z6P8
Public Body: Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine
Section of the Act.: s.29, s.29(1),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the Department's decision.
Date: 25-06-2020
Case Number: OIC-58408-Z7D7Z9
Public Body: Department of Education and Skills
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(g), s.30, s.30(1)(a),
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the decision of the Defence Forces. He found that that it was not required, by virtue of section 10(2)(a), to provide a more detailed statement of reasons as to why the applicant was unsuccessful in his application for recruitment to the Defence Forces. He affirmed the decision of the Defence Forces to refuse access to four records under section 33(3)(a) of the FOI Act. He found that it was not justified in redacting certain information from four other records under section 33(1)(a) and he directed the release of the redacted information.
Date: 19-06-2020
Case Number: OIC-53376-D1X2C5
Public Body: Defence Forces
Section of the Act.: s.33, s.33(1)(a), s.33(3)(a), s.10
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Department. He found that it had justified its decision to refuse access to further records under sections 15(1)(a) and 31(1)(a) of the FOI Act.
Date: 19-06-2020
Case Number: OIC-60363-P8F3Q9
Public Body: Department of Employment Affairs and Social Protection
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a), s.31, s.31(1)(a),
Summary: The Commissioner affirmed the decision of the Department to refuse access to the records at issue under sections 29(1) and 37(1) of the FOI Act.
Date: 18-06-2020
Case Number: OIC-53314-F9G9L8 (190086)
Public Body: Department of Employment Affairs and Social Protection
Section of the Act.: s.11, s.11(1), s.29, s.29(1),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the Department's decision. She found that the Department was justified in refusing to grant access to the record under section 30(1)(a) of the Act on the basis that release of the record could reasonably be expected to prejudice the effectiveness of tests carried out by the Department and the public interest would not, on balance, be better served by the granting of the request.
Date: 18-06-2020
Case Number: OIC-58746-X6Q2W1
Public Body: Department of Education and Skills
Section of the Act.: s.17, s.17(2), s.30, s.30(1)(a),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Defence Forces. He found that the applicant had not shown, on the balance of probabilities, that the information at issue was incomplete, incorrect, or misleading.
Date: 18-06-2020
Case Number: OIC-61125-M1K4R4
Public Body: Defence Forces
Section of the Act.: s.9
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Council
Date: 18-06-2020
Case Number: OIC-67088-D5W9N3
Public Body: Louth County Council
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(d),