Cinntí OIC
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the PRA
Date: 09-03-2017
Case Number: 170021
Public Body: Property Registration Authority
Section of the Act.: s.41, s.41(1),
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the decision of the Hospital. She found that it was not justified in refusing the applicant's request on the basis of section 15(1)(g) of the Act. She also found that there was no obligation to provide a statement of reasons under section 10 of the Act. Finally, she directed the Hospital to reconsider the applicant's request for access to records and to make a new decision on this part of his request.
Date: 08-03-2017
Case Number: 160450
Public Body: St James's Hospital
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(g), s.32, s.32(1)(b),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Hospital
Date: 07-03-2017
Case Number: 160417
Public Body: St James's Hospital
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the Hospital's decision. She found that it was not justified in refusing the applicant's request under section 15(1)(g) of the Act. However, she also found that the Hospital had provided an adequate statement of reasons to the applicant, so that there was no requirement to direct it to take any further actions in this case
Date: 07-03-2017
Case Number: 160451
Public Body: St James's Hospital
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(g), s.10
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the Council was not justified in refusing the applicant's request under section 15(1)(g). He annulled the Council's decision and directed that it undertake a fresh decision-making process on the applicant's request.
Date: 06-03-2017
Case Number: 160530
Public Body: Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(g),
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the HSE's decision. She affirmed the refusal of access to certain information under section 37 of the FOI Act on the basis that the records contained personal information of individuals other than the applicant. She annulled the other parts of the decision and directed the release of the remaining information.
Date: 06-03-2017
Case Number: 160327
Public Body: The HSE
Section of the Act.: s.29, s.29(1), s.31, s.31(1)(a), s.35, s.35(1), s.35(2), s.37, s.37(1), s.37(7),
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the section 38 requirements were not applied correctly in this case and annulled the decision of EirGrid. He directed it to conduct a new decision making process in compliance with the FOI Act.
Date: 03-03-2017
Case Number: 170087
Public Body: EirGrid
Section of the Act.: s.38
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed Revenue?s decision. She found that section 31(1)(a) of the FOI Act applies to the records refused in full or in part by Revenue, as release of these records would disclose legally privileged information.
Date: 03-03-2017
Case Number: 160309
Public Body: Office of the Revenue Commissioners
Section of the Act.: s.31
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the Department's decision. She found that section 15(1)(a) applied to any further information which in the applicant's view should exist. She found that section 36(1)(b) of the FOI Act applied to exempt some of the withheld information and that section 37(1) applied to the remaining withheld information
Date: 01-03-2017
Case Number: 160348
Public Body: Department of Communications, Climate Action and Environment
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a), s.36, s.37
Summary: The Commissioner found that he has the jurisdiction to review the ODPC's decision to refuse the applicant's request for the records concerned on the basis that Schedule 1, Part 1(f) applies. He also found that the records sought do not concern the general administration of the ODPC and he affirmed the decision of the ODPC to refuse the request.
Date: 28-02-2017
Case Number: 160447
Public Body: Data Protection Commissioner
Section of the Act.: