Cinntí OIC
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied Tusla's decision. He found that Tusla was justified under sections 11(4), 15(1)(a) and 31(2) of the FOI Act in its decision to refuse parts of the request, but also directed that Tusla undertake a fresh decision making process in relation to emails that were located in the course of this review.
Date: 03-01-2017
Case Number: 160234
Public Body: TUSLA
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a), s.15(1)(c), s.31, s.31(2), s.11
Summary: Conducted in accordance with section 22(2) of the FOI Act by Stephen Rafferty, Senior Investigator, who is authorised by the Information Commissioner to conduct this review
Date: 03-01-2017
Case Number: 160238
Public Body: TUSLA: Child and Family Agency
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a), s.15(1)(c), s.31, s.31(2), s.42, s.42(e)(ii), s.11, s.37
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Hospital
Date: 22-12-2016
Case Number: 160355
Public Body: Beaumont Hospital
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the decision of the Council. She noted that, in the course of the review, the Council had agreed to release most of the records. She affirmed its decision to refuse access under section 37 of the Act to small parts of certain records containing the personal information of individuals other than the applicant.
Date: 22-12-2016
Case Number: 160200
Public Body: Cork County Council
Section of the Act.: s.29, s.37
Summary: The Senior Investigator annulled the decision of the Service and directed the release of the record.
Date: 22-12-2016
Case Number: 160383
Public Body: Houses of the Oireachtas Service
Section of the Act.: s.30, s.30(1)(a),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the HSE to refuse access to the report on the basis of section 30(1)(a) of the FOI Act.
Date: 22-12-2016
Case Number: 160219
Public Body: Health Service Executive
Section of the Act.: s.30
Summary: The Senior Investigator upheld the Bank?s decision.
Date: 21-12-2016
Case Number: 160399
Public Body: Central Bank Of Ireland
Section of the Act.: s.6
Summary: D'athraigh an tImscrúdaitheoir Sinsear an cinneadh ó FSS. Fuair sí go raibh feidhm ag roinn 31(1)(b) maidir le taifid áirithe. Fuair sí freisin nach raibh feidhm ag roinn 37 maidir leis an fhaisnéis iarchoimeádta i roinnt taifead agus threoraigh sí go scaoilfí na taifid sin. Fuair sí go raibh feidhm ag roinn 37(1) agus/nó 37(7) chun an fhaisnéis iarchoimeádta a bhí fágtha a dhíolmhú.
Date: 21-12-2016
Case Number: 160232
Public Body: Health Service Executive (Feidhmeannacht na Seirbhíse Sláinte)
Section of the Act.: s.31, s.31(1)(b), s.37, s.37(1), s.37(7),
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied AGS' decision. She partially upheld its application of section 36(1)(b) to certain records on the basis that they were commercially sensitive but directed the release in the public interest.of certain records including the total amounts charged to AGS. She affirmed its decision under section 37 to refuse access to other records on the basis that they contained third party personal information about persons other than the applicant, or joint personal information about the applicant and others. She found that the public interest that the rights of privacy of the third parties concerned should be upheld outweighs the public interest that the request be granted. She found other records to be outside the scope of the FOI Act having regard to the provisions of Schedule 1, Part 1(n) of the FOI Act. The Senior Investigator mostly affirmed AGS' reliance on section 15(1)(a) in refusing to release further records. She considered further searches to be warranted in respect of AGS' apparent failure to consider certain invoices, and remitted this matter to AGS for fresh consideration.
Date: 20-12-2016
Case Number: 160276
Public Body: An Garda Síochána
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.36, s.37
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the CER's decision. She found that the CER's decision to refuse access to the majority of the records concerned was justified under section 33(3)(c)(ii) of the FOI Act on the basis that they contained information communicated to the European Commission in confidence. However, she annulled the CER's decision in relation to a small number of records at issue and directed their release.
Date: 20-12-2016
Case Number: 150269
Public Body: Commission for Energy Regulation
Section of the Act.: s.30, s.30(1), s.33, s.33(3), s.41, s.41(1), s.35