Cinntí OIC
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Summary: The Investigator annulled the decision of the Council and directed it to carry out a fresh decision making process.
Date: 22-12-2022
Case Number: OIC-127401-H7G1R0
Public Body: South Dublin County Council
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),
Summary: With the exception of a small amount of information which he found not to constitute personal information, the Senior Investigator affirmed the Authority's decision.
Date: 22-12-2022
Case Number: OIC-114016-T8G4F6
Public Body: Policing Authority
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a), s.15(1)(d), s.15(1)(i)(i), s.37, s.37(1),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed TU Dublin's decision.
Date: 22-12-2022
Case Number: OIC-111728-D1G4S7
Public Body: Technological University Dublin
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),
Summary: The Investigator affirmed ATU's decision
Date: 22-12-2022
Case Number: OIC-126022-G7D3H5
Public Body: Atlantic Technological University
Section of the Act.: s.37, s.37(1),
Summary: The Investigator varied the Council's decision.
Date: 22-12-2022
Case Number: OIC-122728-W6D1M6
Public Body: Laois County Council
Section of the Act.: s.35, s.35(1)(a), s.37, s.37(1), s.37(7),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the CSSO's decision.
Date: 21-12-2022
Case Number: OIC-127117-S9X9P6
Public Body: Chief State Solicitor's Office
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(d), s.42, s.42(f),
Summary: The Investigator affirmed the decision of the Department.
Date: 21-12-2022
Case Number: OIC-129460-S4L3W5
Public Body: Department of Justice
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the decision of the Department. He found that it was justified in redacting certain information from the records under section 37(1), apart from a small amount of information to which he found section 37(1) not to apply. He found that the Department was justified in refusing access to two records under section 33(1)(d) of the Act.
Date: 22-12-2022
Case Number: OIC-113680-D4B6T7
Public Body: Department of Foreign Affairs
Section of the Act.: s.33, s.33(1)(d), s.37, s.37(1),
Summary: The Investigator affirmed the decision of the HSE.
Date: 20-12-2022
Case Number: OIC-131565-Y5S5J5
Public Body: Health Service Executive
Section of the Act.: s.37
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the Council's decision. He found that the Council was justified in refusing access to certain records on the basis of section 15(1)(a) and 36(1)(b) of the FOI Act and found that the public interest, on balance, did not favour their release. He found that the Council was not justified in refusing access to other records on the basis of sections 35(1)(a), 36(1)(b) and 36(1)(c). He directed their release, subject to the redaction of personal information.
Date: 20-12-2022
Case Number: OIC-122178-Z9M1M9
Public Body: Dublin City Council
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a), s.35, s.35(1)(a), s.35(1)(b), s.36, s.36(1)(b), s.36(1)(c),