Cinntí OIC
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Summary: The Senior Investigator annulled the decision of MSLETB to charge search and retrieval fees in respect of the records sought and directed it to process the application afresh
Date: 11-05-2022
Case Number: OIC-116830-T4D8J
Public Body: Mayo, Sligo and Leitrim Education and Training Board
Section of the Act.: s.27, s.27(2),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the University's decision.
Date: 10-05-2022
Case Number: OIC-120341-P1T9J
Public Body: University College Dublin
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(d),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the Department's decision.
Date: 06-05-2022
Case Number: OIC-118009-K8G6X6
Public Body: Department of Justice
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of CETB
Date: 06-05-2022
Case Number: OIC-118618-C2K5X5
Public Body: Cork Education and Training Board
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the Council's decision. He found that it was not justified in refusing the request under sections 15(1)(a) or 15(1)(c). He found that it was justified in refusing access, under section 37(1), to the names and address of individual landlords. He found that the Council had not justified its refusal of the information sought relating to corporate landlords and remitted the matter back to the Council for consideration afresh.
Date: 05-05-2022
Case Number: OIC-110328-X3G4Q7
Public Body: Limerick City and County Council
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a), s.15(1)(c),
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the decision of Tusla. While he found that it was justified in refusing access to the vast majority of the information at issue under section 37 of the FOI Act, he directed the release of a small amount of additional information. He also found that Tusla was justified, under section 15(1)(a) of the Act, in refusing access to further records on the ground that no further relevant records can be found.
Date: 04-05-2022
Case Number: OIC-117087-Z5X5L5
Public Body: TUSLA: Child and Family Agency
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1), s.37, s.37(7),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Council. He found that the Council was justified in refusing access to the withheld information under section 37 of the FOI Act.
Date: 03-05-2022
Case Number: OIC-109749-N1W4Q5
Public Body: Longford County Council
Section of the Act.: s.37, s.37(1),
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the decision of the VCI. While he found that it was justified in redacting certain parts of the records under section 37(1) of the Act, he directed the release of the remaining parts that had been redacted.
Date: 29-04-2022
Case Number: OIC-112288-M7W7C3
Public Body: Veterinary Council of Ireland
Section of the Act.: s.29, s.29(1), s.30, s.30(1)(a), s.35, s.35(1), s.37, s.37(1), s.42, s.42(m)(i),
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the decision of the Service. He found it was justified in refusing access to the vast majority of the information and records at issue under sections 37(1) and 42(k). However, he found section 37(1) did not apply to a certain amount of information in the records and he directed its release.
Date: 27-04-2022
Case Number: OIC-116961-D1M3P8
Public Body: Houses of the Oireachtas Service (the Service)
Section of the Act.: s.37, s.37(1), s.42
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the Council's refusal of the applicant's requests under section 15(1)(g).
Date: 26-04-2022
Case Number: OIC-119298-R7N0Y8
Public Body: Sligo County Council
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(g),