Cinntí OIC
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the Department's decision. He found that the Department was justified in refusing access to certain records under sections 42(m)(i), 42(f), 31(1)(a) and 37(1) of the FOI Act. He found that it was also justified in refusing access to additional specified records under section 15(1)(a) of the FOI Act on the ground that the records sought could not be found.
Date: 17-10-2022
Case Number: OIC-102709-Y3Z0N0
Public Body: Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a), s.31, s.31(1)(a), s.37, s.37(1), s.42, s.42(g), s.42(m)(i),
Summary: The Investigator affirmed the HSE's decision
Date: 14-10-2022
Case Number: OIC-125916-N7C0H9
Public Body: Health Service Executive
Section of the Act.: s.37, s.37(1),
Summary: The Investigator affirmed the decision of the Council
Date: 14-10-2022
Case Number: OIC-127620-X9L4T7
Public Body: Limerick City and County Council
Section of the Act.: s.37, s.37(1),
Summary: The Investigator affirmed the body's decision. She found that section 32(1)(c) (facilitate commission of an offence) applied to passwords. She found that section 37(1) (personal information) applied to the remaining details and that the public interest did not weigh in favour of their release.
Date: 13-10-2022
Case Number: OIC-123480-H7G6L6
Public Body: An FOI Body
Section of the Act.: s.37, s.37(1), s.32
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the decision of Tusla. While he affirmed Tusla's decision to refuse access to the majority of the remaining information in the records on the basis of sections 31(1)(a) and 37 of the Act, he directed the release of some of the redacted information on the ground that section 37(1) did not apply.
Date: 13-10-2022
Case Number: OIC-120121-C0B7V2
Public Body: Tusla
Section of the Act.: s.31, s.31(1)(a), s.37, s.37(1),
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied Revenue's decision. She affirmed its application of section 15(1)(a) (reasonable searches/records do not exist). She affirmed the refusal of some records under section 15(1)(i) (records already released) but annulled Revenue's decision on the remainder, and directed it to make a new decision on these records. She affirmed Revenue's application of section 37(1) (personal information) to certain details and found that the public interest did not weigh in favour of their release. She found that some information was exempt under sections 31(1)(a) (legal professional privilege) and 41(1)(a) (disclosure prohibited by an enactment). She annulled Revenue's refusal of the remaining withheld records and parts of records under sections 30(1)(a) (effectiveness of audits) and section 32(1)(a)(i) (investigation of offences) and directed Revenue to grant access to the details concerned.
Date: 13-10-2022
Case Number: OIC-115307-G3S4Y0
Public Body: Office of the Revenue Commissioners
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a), s.15(1)(i), s.30, s.30(1)(a), s.31, s.31(1)(a), s.32, s.32(1)(a)(i), s.32(1)(a)(ii), s.37, s.37(1), s.41, s.41(1)(a),
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the Hospital's decision. She found that it had not justified its reliance on sections 15(1)(a), 30(1)(a) or 30(1)(b) of the FOI Act and annulled its decision in this regard. She directed the Hospital to grant access to the withheld records, other than a very small amount of information that she found was exempt under section 37(1) (personal information). She directed the Hospital to make a fresh decision on the search aspect of the case, in accordance with the provisions of the FOI Act.
Date: 13-10-2022
Case Number: OIC-119950-N1T9N9
Public Body: St. James's Hospital
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a), s.30, s.30(1)(a), s.30(1)(b), s.37, s.37(1),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the HSE.
Date: 12-10-2022
Case Number: OIC-127021-Y5P0V8
Public Body: Health Service Executive
Section of the Act.: s.37
Summary: The Investigator varied the Hospital's decision. While she affirmed its decision to refuse access to certain information under section 37(1), she directed the release of the remaining records.
Date: 12-10-2022
Case Number: OIC-125371-V0S7Z1
Public Body: Beaumont Hospital
Section of the Act.: s.29, s.29(1), s.30, s.30(1)(a), s.30(1)(b), s.30(1)(c), s.37, s.37(1),
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the decision of the Department. He found that the Department was justified in refusing access to the majority of the information within scope under section 37(1), but that it was not justified in refusing access to part of one record under section 28. He directed the release of the relevant part.
Date: 11-10-2022
Case Number: OIC-113225-N2Y2Q0
Public Body: Department of Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(d), s.37, s.37(1), s.28