Cinntí OIC
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Summary: The Senior Investigator annulled Revenue’s decision and directed it to consider the request afresh.
Date: 18-12-2024
Case Number: OIC-150867-D4V4R9
Public Body: Office of the Revenue Commissioners
Section of the Act.: s.12, s.12(1)(b),
Summary: The Senior Investigator annulled the Council’s decision. He directed the release of the information sought.
Date: 17-12-2024
Case Number: OIC-140202-P2S7C2
Public Body: Dublin City Council
Section of the Act.: s.37, s.37(1),
Summary: The Investigator affirmed the decision of the Council
Date: 17-12-2024
Case Number: OIC-150010-V7N2X9
Public Body: Wexford County Council
Section of the Act.: s.32, s.32(1)(a), s.36, s.36(1)(b),
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the Department’s decision. He found that the Department was justified in withholding a small amount of information contained in two of the records at issue under sections 32(1)(a)(iii), 32(1)(a)(ix) and 35(1)(b) of the FOI Act. He found that it was not justified in refusing access to the vast majority of the records under sections 32(1), 35(1), or 36(1) and he directed the release of those records.
Date: 17-12-2024
Case Number: OIC-130458-Y1S5D2
Public Body: Department of Transport
Section of the Act.: s.31, s.31(1)(a), s.35, s.35(1)(a), s.35(1)(b), s.36, s.36(1)(b), s.36(1)(c),
Summary: The Commissioner affirmed the HSE’s decision to refuse access to the records at issue under section 30(1)(a) of the FOI Act.
Date: 17-12-2024
Case Number: OIC-151414-Q7M3D9
Public Body: Health Service Executive
Section of the Act.: s.30, s.30(1)(a),
Summary: The Commissioner affirmed the decision of the Courts Service to refuse the request under section 42(a)(i) of the Act.
Date: 17-12-2024
Case Number: OIC-150117-D8X3G1
Public Body: The Courts Service
Section of the Act.: s.42, s.42(a),
Summary: The Investigator varied the decision of Tusla. He affirmed its decision to refuse access to parts 1,3 and 5 of the applicant’s request under section 15(1)(a) of the Act. He found that Tusla was not justified in refusing accessing to the data it refused under section 37(1) of the Act relating to parts 2 and 4 of the applicant’s request and directed the release of that data.
Date: 17-12-2024
Case Number: OIC-149137-H2X8W6
Public Body: Tusla
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a), s.37, s.37(1),
Summary: The Investigator varied the decision of BIM
Date: 16-12-2024
Case Number: OIC-142189-V7Z8J1
Public Body: An Bord Iascaigh Mhara
Section of the Act.: s.37, s.37(1),
Summary: The Investigator varied the Department’s decision. He affirmed its decision to refuse access to information relating to IIP applicants under section 37(1). He annulled the Department’s decision to refuse access to certain records under section 15(1)(a), as he found that the Department had not taken reasonable steps to locate them. He directed the Department to carry out a fresh decision making process in relation to that part of the request. He affirmed the Department’s effective decision to refuse access to records relating to third party beneficiaries of IIP investment under section 15(1)(a).
Date: 16-12-2024
Case Number: OIC-136117-F4R7G3
Public Body: Department of Justice
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a), s.17, s.17(4), s.36, s.36(1)(b), s.37, s.37(1),
Summary: The Investigator annulled the CRU’s decision and remitted the request to be processed afresh.
Date: 13-12-2024
Case Number: OIC-144618-X2H4Z0
Public Body: The Commission for Regulation of Utilities
Section of the Act.: s.29, s.29(1), s.30, s.30(1)(a), s.30(1)(c), s.36, s.36(1)(b), s.37, s.37(1),