Cinntí OIC
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the HSE.
Date: 14-06-2024
Case Number: OIC-141853-M8D2R4
Public Body: Health Service Executive
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a), s.15(1)(i),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the Department’s decision.
Date: 14-06-2024
Case Number: OIC-147419-D4Z2T7
Public Body: Department of Finance
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the Department’s decision. While he found that it was justified in refusing access to certain records under section 30(1)(c), he found that it was not justified in refusing access to the remaining records withheld on the basis of sections 30(1)(a), 30(1)(b) and/or 29(1), and he directed the release of those records to the applicant, subject to the redaction of a small amount of third party personal information.
Date: 13-06-2024
Case Number: OIC-133419-N0K0K6
Public Body: Department of Public Expenditure, NDP Delivery and Reform
Section of the Act.: s.29, s.29(1), s.31,
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the Department’s decision
Date: 13-06-2024
Case Number: OIC-148434-R9P4G8
Public Body: Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine
Section of the Act.: s.42, s.42(j),
Summary: The Investigator affirmed UCD’s decision. He found that it was justified in refusing access to the information at issue under section 30(1)(b) of the FOI Act.
Date: 11-06-2024
Case Number: OIC-142867-F2B0S5
Public Body: University College Dublin
Section of the Act.: s.30, s.30(1)(b),
Summary: The Investigator affirmed the Department’s decision.
Date: 11-06-2024
Case Number: OIC-145812-D2X9B4
Public Body: Department of Social Protection
Section of the Act.: s.37, s.37(1),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the Department’s decision. He found that as the records sought related to a protected disclosures report, the FOI Act does not apply to the records pursuant to section 42(ja).
Date: 11-06-2024
Case Number: OIC-146345-F2H8M1
Public Body: Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a), s.42, s.42(j),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Department to refuse access to the record under section 29(1) of the FOI Act.
Date: 10-06-2024
Case Number: OIC-136616-Z1W9Y4
Public Body: Department of Education
Section of the Act.: s.22,
Summary: The Investigator affirmed Tusla’s decision
Date: 06-06-2024
Case Number: OIC-146219-R0W0H5
Public Body: Tusla
Section of the Act.: s.37, s.37(1), s.37(7),
Summary: The Investigator affirmed the HSE’s decision
Date: 05-06-2024
Case Number: OIC-142155-F5H2T2
Public Body: Health Service Executive
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),