Cinntí OIC
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the section 38 requirements were not applied correctly in this case to such an extent that the Commissioner had not jurisdiction to deal further with it. She annulled the decision of the HSE.
Date: 05-10-2015
Case Number: 150279
Public Body: The Health Service Executive
Section of the Act.: s.38
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the decision of the Council and found that the Council was justified in its decision to refuse access to some records under sections 15(1)(a), 31(1)(a) and 37(1) of the Act. She further found that a number of records did not qualify for the exemption at section 31(1)(a) (Legal Professional Privilege) and she directed their release.
Date: 02-10-2015
Case Number: 150070
Public Body: Cork County Council
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Commissioner, having accepted that the Department did not physically hold the requested records, upheld the Department's refusal thereof under section 10(1)(a) of the FOI Act. He also upheld the Department's effective refusal of the records on the basis that section 6(9) of the FOI Act did not apply. However, he annulled the Department's effective refusal of the records under section 2(5)(a) of the FOI Act, having been satisfied that the Department controls Bus Éireann's operation of, and records relating to, the scheme. He directed the Department to undertake a fresh decision making process.
Date: 02-10-2015
Case Number: 150067
Public Body: Department of Education and Skills
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Commissioner affirmed the Department's decision and found that section 36(1)(b) of the FOI Act applied to exempt the employers' details on the basis of commercial sensitivity. He also found, in the circumstances of this case (particularly the Department's acknowledgment that it was not satisfied its internal guidelines for sanctioning employers were sufficiently comprehensive to ensure that fair procedure was afforded to all of those employers), that the public interest would not, on balance, be better served by granting the request.
Date: 02-10-2015
Case Number: 150104
Public Body: Department of Social Protection
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the HSE's decision and directed the release of a number of recommendations and other general material contained in the report. She affirmed the decision to refuse access to the main body of the report.
Date: 30-09-2015
Case Number: 140327
Public Body: Health Service Executive
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the HSE was justified in its decision to refuse access to the records sought by the applicant under section 15(1)(a) of the FOI Act. She affirmed the decision of the HSE.
Date: 30-09-2015
Case Number: 150163
Public Body: The Health Service Executive
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of UCC.
Date: 29-09-2015
Case Number: 150129
Public Body: University College Cork
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the HSE's decision. She found it was justified in its decision to refuse access to the records sought by the applicant under section 10(1)(a) of the Act, on the basis that they do not exist or cannot be found after reasonable searches for the records have been performed.
Date: 28-09-2015
Case Number: 150166
Public Body: The Health Service Executive
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the decision of the Institution. She affirmed that part of its decision relating to section 10(1)(a) of the Act. She annulled the Institution's decision to refuse records on the basis of sections 20(1) and/or 21(1)(b) of the Act and she directed release of the records in question.
Date: 24-09-2015
Case Number: 140267
Public Body: Third Level Institution
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the Council was not justified in deciding to refuse access to the record in accordance with sections 35(1)(a) and 42(m)(i) of the FOI Act. She varied the Council's decision, directing it to release the record subject to the redaction of personal information relating to the complainant.
Date: 24-09-2015
Case Number: 150153
Public Body: Cork County Council
Section of the Act.: