Cinntí OIC
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the Council's decision to refuse access to the information sought under the provisions of section 27(1)(b) of the FOI Act.
Date: 23-02-2015
Case Number: 140193
Public Body: Kildare County Council
Section of the Act.: s.26, s.27, s.31
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the decision of the Authority. While he affirmed the Authority's decision to refuse access to one record under section 22(1)(a) of the FOI Act, he directed the release of two further records on the ground that they were not exempt from release under that provision. He also affirmed the Authority's decision to refuse access to further relevant records on the ground that no such records exist or can be found.
Date: 23-02-2015
Case Number: 140197
Public Body: Equality Authority
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Commissioner found that the Department had not justified its decision to refuse access to the records. He annulled the Department's decision and directed the release of the records.
Date: 19-02-2015
Case Number: 140074
Public Body: Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Information Commissioner decided that it was not necessary to make findings on the withheld employer names because the Department had, albeit inadvertently, released those names to the applicant under the FOI Act. Neither was it necessary to make a decision on the withheld Company ID field insofar as it concerned employers whose names the Department had intentionally released. This aspect of the review was settled following an offer by the Department to match the names concerned to details it had already released concerning the internships advertised by those employers. The Commissioner annulled the refusal, and directed the release of, the details within the Company ID field insofar as it concerned the remaining employers, on the basis that the Department had not justified its refusal of the details concerned.
Date: 19-02-2015
Case Number: 120314
Public Body: Department of Social Protection
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the Council was justified in its decision to withhold the name requested on the ground that section 23(1)(b) of the FOI Act applies.
Date: 18-02-2015
Case Number: 140289
Public Body: Wexford County Council
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the HSE's decision.
Date: 18-02-2015
Case Number: 140303
Public Body: HSE South
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the HSE to refuse access to the withheld information under sections 28(1) and 28(5B) of the FOI Act.
Date: 16-02-2015
Case Number: 140249
Public Body: HSE South
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the Agency was justified in deciding to refuse access to the records sought by the applicant on the basis of sections 28(1) and 28(5B) of the FOI Act. He affirmed the decision of the Agency.
Date: 16-02-2015
Case Number: 140337
Public Body: TUSLA
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the HSE was not justified in its decision to refuse to amend records under section 17 of the FOI Act. He annulled the decision of the HSE and directed that the records be amended.
Date: 13-02-2015
Case Number: 140039
Public Body: HSE West
Section of the Act.: s.17, s.17(1),
Summary: The Senior Investigator annulled the decision of the Agency in relation to part 1 of the request and directed the Agency to undertake a fresh decision making process in respect of the records captured by that part of the request. He varied the decision of the Agency in relation to part 2 and he directed part release of the record at issue.
Date: 11-02-2015
Case Number: 140185
Public Body: TUSLA
Section of the Act.: