Cinntí OIC
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Is féidir cinntí a eisíodh ó Eanáir 2022 ar aghaidh a fháil anseo. Má theastaíonn cinneadh níos luaithe uait, déan teagmháil linn ag info@oic.ie
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Department.
Date: 16-11-2022
Case Number: OIC-116773-C2M5R4
Public Body: Department of Justice
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a), s.31, s.31(1)(a), s.37, s.37(1), s.42, s.42(j),
Summary: The Senior Investigator annulled the decision of the Defence Forces. He directed it to undertake a fresh decision making process.
Date: 15-11-2022
Case Number: OIC-125682-Q3L8W0
Public Body: Defence Forces
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(i),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of TCD. He found that it was justified in refusing access, under section 29(1) of the Act, to the records sought.
Date: 15-11-2022
Case Number: OIC-116921-H5B5X5
Public Body: Trinity College Dublin
Section of the Act.: s.29, s.29(1),
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the Department's decision. He found that it was not justified in redacting a small amount of information from one of the records and directed its release. He affirmed its decision to redact the remaining information under section 37(1) and its refusal to grant access to any additional records under section 15(1)(a).
Date: 14-11-2022
Case Number: OIC-125295-X5Q2R5, OIC-125303- V1R2V7
Public Body: Department of Education
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a), s.37, s.37(1),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the Council's decision
Date: 11-11-2022
Case Number: OIC-121816-L1L7G3
Public Body: Roscommon County Council
Section of the Act.: s.37, s.37(1),
Summary: The Investigator affirmed the HSE's decisions.
Date: 11-11-2022
Case Number: OIC-126229-W5D3Q2, OIC-126228-G8N2J7
Public Body: Health Service Executive
Section of the Act.: s.37, s.37(1), s.37(8),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the FSPO.
Date: 11-11-2022
Case Number: OIC-127443-P3G8J3
Public Body: Financial Services and Pensions Ombudsman
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),
Summary: The Investigator affirmed the decision of Tusla
Date: 11-11-2022
Case Number: OIC-121831-H3G4Z1
Public Body: Tusla, Child & Family Agency
Section of the Act.: s.37, s.37(1), s.37(2)(a), s.37(2)(c), s.37(2)(e), s.37(8),
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the decision of the Council. He found that the Council was justified in refusing access to certain records on the basis of sections 15(1)(d), 31(1) and 37(1) of the FOI Act. He found that the Council was not justified in refusing access to other records on the basis of section 31(1) and that it was not justified in refusing access to certain records on the basis of section 29(1) of the FOI Act. He directed their release, subject to the redaction of personal information.
Date: 10-11-2022
Case Number: OIC-123014-Y4H5V5
Public Body: Wexford County Council
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(d), s.29, s.29(1), s.31, s.31(1), s.35, s.35(1), s.37, s.37(1),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the CRO.
Date: 10-11-2022
Case Number: OIC-129112-M1Y1H4
Public Body: Companies Registration Office
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(2)(b),